Compare

Platform breakdown

Visibility is never uniform. Split your score by ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity to see where you are winning and losing.

The same questions asked of every enabled platform, so the split is comparable.
Per-platform visibility, tracked over time rather than as a single snapshot.
A brand-by-platform grid, so you can see which platform favours which competitor.

One brand, four very different answers

Platforms weight sources differently and update at different rates. A single blended number hides the one platform where you are invisible.

Who each platform names, side by side.

Brand	ChatGPT	Claude	Gemini	Perplexity
Amazon Web Services	89.2%	65.4%	72.8%	82.7%
VercelYou	81%	57.2%	64.6%	74.5%
Netlify	72.8%	49%	56.4%	66.3%
Cloudflare	65.4%	41.6%	49%	58.9%
Render	43.7%	19.9%	27.3%	37.2%
Railway	31.3%	7.5%	14.9%	24.8%

Sample data for a fictional brand. Not measured, and these brands are not customers.

Each tracked question is sent to every enabled platform in the same cycle, using shared search context so the inputs match.

Results are stored per platform, so a strong showing on one never masks an absence on another.

A brand-by-platform grid puts every tracked brand against every platform at once, which is where the outliers become obvious.

A metric that does not change a decision is a metric worth deleting. These are the ones that do.

Signal

Decision

You are strong on one platform and absent on another.

Look at what the weak platform cites — its source mix is usually the difference, not your brand.

A platform names a competitor you rarely see elsewhere.

That platform is weighting a source they are present in. Find it in the citation view.

All platforms move together.

Something changed in the category or in your own content, not in a single provider's model.

Enter your domain and start tracking. One URL sets it up, and it runs every day on its own.